Skip to main content

    What if product marketing saw itself as "problem solving marketing"?

    Bob Apollo
    Post by Bob Apollo
    November 9, 2009
    What if product marketing saw itself as "problem solving marketing"?

    I was reflecting on a thought-provoking blog by Dave Brock, who asked "what would happen if we saw things the way our customers saw them?".

    As Dave points out, your capabilities as a vendor are irrelevant unless and until they can be connected to your prospect’s challenges in a language they can relate to. Your value propositions can’t be generic – they have to relate to what really matters to the prospect.

    Problem SolverThe really smart sales people have already figured this out.  That’s why they so often tailor the “corporate” presentations churned out by marketing to reflect what they have learned their prospects are really interested in... which is almost never the "feeds and speeds" or technobabble so beloved of the average product pitch.

    Marketers, this is no time to get upset with them or curse them as rebels.   They are only responding to what they sense their prospects are looking for - and remember they are probably having many more prospect conversations than anyone else in the organisation.  Let's celebrate their adaptability!

    Imagine what could happen if product marketing listened to and learned from their wisdom?  Imagine what they could produce if they saw their primary role as "problem solving marketing" instead?

    Of course, the best product marketers do this already - to the great benefit of the organisations they work for.  But from my observations, many others - and it's a significant proportion - are still far too fixated about what their product does, rather than what problem it solves.

    The resulting sales tools often end up wandering around like the Marie Celeste, with no clear sense of their destination or what role they play in facilitating the prospect's buying process.  As a result, as many as nine out of ten corporate sales tools end up being little used by sales people.   It's a huge sales enablement challenge for many organisations.

    I'd like to suggest a checklist that could help to ensure that sales materials are focused on the problem, not the product:

    • What problem are we trying to solve?
    • Who are we trying to solve it for? 
    • How will they recognise they have a problem?
    • How do our capabilities help them solve the problem?
    • What phase in the buying process is the sales tool intended to support?
    • What do we want the prospect to do as a result of the tool?

    I think it's a fair bet that if your organisation's sales tools were designed with these questions in mind that your sales people would be more inclined to use them and less inclined to develop their own.  Even more so if they contributed to the design and development of the tools in the first place.

    Am I on the right track?  I'd love to hear your thoughts on the matter.

    Are you ready for a fresh perspective?

    Would you like to learn more?  Then please continue to browse the site and when you are ready, contact me here or call me on +44 7802 313300.

    I look forward to hearing from you!

    Bob Apollo
    Post by Bob Apollo
    November 9, 2009
    Bob Apollo is a Fellow of the Institute of Sales Professionals, a regular contributor to the International Journal of Sales Transformation and Top Sales World Magazine, and the driving force behind Inflexion-Point Strategy Partners, the leading proponents of outcome-centric selling. Following a successful corporate career spanning start-ups, scale-ups and market leaders, Bob now works as a strategic advisor, mentor, trainer and coach to ambitious B2B sales organisations - teaching them how to differentiate themselves through their provably superior approach to achieving their customer's desired outcomes.

    Comments