Subscribe to blog...

Your email:

Stay connected...

Browse by Tag

Inflexion-Points: Smart Ideas for Accelerating Revenue Growth

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

B2B Buying Cycle Alignment: 4 in 5 sales organisations must do better

 

CSO Insights have just published their 2012 Sales Management Optimisation study.  As always, the conclusions from their latest research make compelling reading - and provide B2B sales leaders with much to think about.

I’ll be offering a series of recommendations from their research over the coming weeks, but I wanted to start by focusing on a new metric that CSO Insights introduced to the study this year: how effectively B2B sales organisations are tracking the real progress of their prospect’s buying decision process.

Fewer than 20% of sales organisations continually track buying behaviour

I found the answer very disturbing, and I think you will too: Fewer than 20% of the 600+ companies surveyed had the discipline to continually track specific buying behaviours in order to assess the true state of their sales pipelines. More than half never bothered to track buying behaviour, or only did so in an ad-hoc fashion.

The majority of the sales organisations surveyed - a representative cross section of businesses across multiple verticals and geographies - appear to be relying primarily on self-reported sales activity, rather than insisting on provable evidence of buying behaviour when it comes to managing their sales pipelines.

Sales forecast accuracy remains a critical challenge

So perhaps it’s no wonder that sales forecast accuracy continues to bedevil most sales organisations, with on average less than half of forecasted deals actually closing at the time or for the value predicted by the sales person. But the sales organisations that had implemented buying cycle tracking did far better.

If you want a simple justification for why it’s worth insisting that your sales people provide evidence of their prospect’s buying behaviour, consider this: the sales organisations that did so won nearly 40% more of their forecasted deals than the organisations that paid no attention to it - and had far fewer losses and “no decisions”.

You must focus on the buying process

If you’re amongst the 80% of sales organisations that could and should be doing better, you must start by aligning your pipeline stages with the key phases in your prospect’s buying decision process. At each stage, you must anticipate your prospect’s likely intentions, concerns and motivations, and align your sales activities accordingly.

But most important, you must establish clear gates or milestones between each stage of the pipeline that can only be navigated if your sales person can provide reliable evidence that the prospect has made a significant, observable and clearly defined step forward in their buying process.

Document the results of your sales conversation

CSO Insights make one particular recommendation that I believe every sales organisation needs to implement as a basic discipline: after every significant interaction with the prospect, and most particularly when needs are identified, requirements established or the decision process or criteria agreed, the sales person must record their understanding in an email to the prospect and have the prospect correct or agree their assumptions - and attach the correspondence to the opportunity record in the CRM system.

Be prepared for a reality check

If you implement this process - and given the dramatically better performance shown by organisations that have embraced this, I can’t imagine why you would not - you need to be prepared for a reality check.

Inevitably, applying a rigorous, evidence-based approach to accurately placing your prospects in your pipeline based on the true state of their buying decision process will mean that a number of opportunities will slip backwards or fall out of the pipeline altogether.

This may make it appear that your pipeline has shrunk. But these deals were never real - or as well advanced as you thought - in the first place. And you will be far better off flushing them out rather than continuing to fool yourself.

Start transforming your sales forecast accuracy today

If you’re one of the 4 in 5 sales organisations that could and should be doing better, I’d encourage you to start today by:

    • Redefining your pipeline stages to reflect the buying process
    • Establishing clearly defined gates or milestones between each stage based on observable evidence of buying behaviour
    • Insisting that your sales people requalify every opportunity and review their conclusions with you - backed by the evidence
    • Insisting that your sales people document their agreements and assumptions and validate them with the prospect

Your prospects will appreciate it - your organisation will come across as highly professional. But most important of all, you could end up winning as much as 40% more of your forecasted opportunities. We've helped a number of clients implement these disciplines, and I'd be happy to share what we've learned - just drop me a line.

Post by: Bob Apollo of Inflexion-Point | @bobapollo | LinkedIn 

Join me in London on May 29th for "Turbo-charging the complex sale"

Comments

Buying stage sales cycle stages are not necessarily opposite sides of the same coin. They can be aligned at a "subjective" or qualitative or narrative level, but a sales cycle is fundamentally a probabilty construct rather than a sales tool. Aligning them is not as easy or as meaningful as people often suggest and therefore, leads to ineffective pipeline management. This is a quite subtle area, virtually impossible to get agreement on, until you go back and take out 101 probability theory, and I don't mean that my close rate is 80%.  
 
 
 
The "leveller" is the accuracy of forecasts: aligning buying stages to sales stages, will not automatically or even logically improve forecasting. Usually it leads to longer explanations of dead deals,UNLESS you can metrically validate your assumptions with the prospect. I'd appreciate hearing how people metrically validate their assumptions with prospects because 
 
it's the elephant in the forecasting room.
Posted @ Friday, April 13, 2012 10:37 AM by Michael McGowan
It is really great to see more and more focus on the buying process by sales organizations and how they are trying to align with forecasting.  
 
From our research, when we see deal closing rates improve the sales teams are focusing not only on the buyers process but also on the business decisions/business case (why buy at all?) and the buying organization (the depth and breath of who is buying). It is the three factors combined that the buyer works on to get budgets sanctioned, so sellers doing the same deliver alignment and results for both themselves and the buyer.  
 
We know a number of sales directors who wont allow their sales team to forecast unless they can prove that the buyer is going to buy from someone. Their view is: "if the sale team can map the buyers process and prove a business decision will be made to buy, then forecast accuracy and conversion rates improve". Worth pointing out these sales directors are focused on high value B2B selling.  
All the best 
John
Posted @ Thursday, April 19, 2012 11:32 AM by John O' Gorman
This article is fine philosophically, but we find there's a lot of front-end work that has to go into keeping a pipeline full: cold calls, demos, appointments, etc. There's also the matter of keeping track of it all, through a database.
Posted @ Monday, April 23, 2012 12:21 PM by john heinrich
John, of course you're right: aligning the sales process with the buying process is just one part of the puzzle. But you might be surprised how much easier it is to fill the top of the funnel when you're thinking about the issue from the buyer's perspective.
Posted @ Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:31 AM by Bob Apollo
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics