Subscribe to this Blog

Your email:

Executive Briefing 166w Blue 

Whats Holding You Back Self Assessment 166w Green

OpenView Labs Top 25

Get Connected

Favourite Bloggers

 

Browse by tag

Accelerating Revenue Growth: The Inflexion-Point Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

B2B sales: how do your prospects approach risk?

 

Jill Konrath's "Selling to Big Companies" website is a must-read resource for anyone concerned with improving their sales performance.  In a recent blog, Jill asked her readers to share their experiences of dealing with their prospect's perceptions of risk.  It's a key challenge in today's risk-averse buying climate.  Here's what I wrote:

Hi Jill

Great question - and one that’s incredibly relevant in today’s market, where the avoidance of risk may well be the predominant emotion driving buying behaviour, and where so many buying journeys end in a decision to hold off and do nothing for the moment.

RISKI’m speaking from the perspective of complex B2B buying processes, where it seems that having a strong ROI is not enough to win the prospect’s confidence.  Successful vendors are having to prove that they offer the lowest risk of all possible alternatives, including - this is critically important - the decision to simply “do nothing”.

Sales people can’t hope to emerge as the lowest risk alternative through some last-minute slight-of-hand during the closing process.  The foundations need to be built from the start of the buying process.  Rather than diving in to premature (product) elaboration, when a prospect acknowledges an issue, the top sales performers I’ve been able to observe seize the opportunity to explore:

  • What has caused the issue to become important at this point?
  • Who else is likely to be affected by the issue?
  • What would be the cost/impact of not dealing with the problem?

Handled well, these and similar questions can open the door to identifying and connecting with the other affected stakeholders early on in the sales process.  Just as important, they can lay the foundation for helping the prospect identify the costs and consequences of not dealing with the problem.

In fact, I advise the clients I work with to think very hard about qualifying out opportunities where the prospect cannot easily articulate the consequences of inaction – because in today’s risk-averse climate they run the risk of doing all the hard work of eliminating the competition, and getting chosen, but not getting bought.

Vendors who are able to help their prospect clearly balance the benefits of solving the problem against the costs of doing nothing, and to present this to the financial approval process, will be in a much better position to address the risk issue – and will have truly earned their role as “trusted advisor”. 

What's your experience?  How importance is risk avoidance in your prospect's thinking?  And how have you been able to help them alleviate the perceived risks in making a buying decision?

Comments

Bob: 
 
Thanks for your concise post which is dead-on. Those three questions are the lever to avoid the "no decision" malaise that plagues so many sales professionals. If the sales team cannot reduce the risk (perceived and/or real) during the sales process, "no decision" becomes the most likely outcome.  
 
 
 
It takes courage to opt-out of an opportunity, but if the sales team can't get hard answers to your three questions, opting out becomes a viable option. Chasing unwinnable deals has a tremendous impact (negative) on overall sales productivity.
Posted @ Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:22 PM by Duncan Law
Bob:  
Like Duncan I think your post concise and on target. My concern is why a sale devolves to the "No Decision" point.  
Sales professionals should know or need to be instructed about the phases of a typical sales process and how a clients levels of concern change regarding key elements throughout the process, elements like - Price, Risk, Solution, and Needs.  
Risk is not at high levels in the early stages of the typical sales process but is at its' highest in the final stage. Being aware of these levels of concern allows the sale person to work with the client to address Risk early and to therefore minimize Risk in the later stage.  
If a “No Decision” point is the outcome my belief is that the sales person lost control earlier and missed something or somebody. By using similar questions that the top sales performers explore early in the sales process, as pointed out in your post, coupled with ROI exploration (which should include the CODN – Cost of Doing Nothing), by using the product or solution elaboration as a closing tool and by undertaking the concept of a pre-proposal meeting – one in which a theoretical or draft proposal is discussed in minute detail – its possible to take Risk out of the equation. 
Posted @ Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:32 AM by Mark Mitchell
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics