Subscribe to this Blog

Your email:

B2B Sales and Marketing Alignment

 CustomerThink Logo

OpenView Labs Top 25

Let's Get Connected!

Webinar Replay

Impact Workshop

B2B Sales and Marketing Audit

describe the image

B2B Sales and Marketing 12 Key Initiatives

Crossing the Chasm

Favourite Bloggers ...

 

Browse by tag...

Accelerating Revenue Growth: The Inflexion-Point Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

McKinsey and the end of the Road Warrior...

 

As we emerge from the downturn, it’s clear that we’re going to have to find new and better ways of reaching and satisfying our customers.  The May 2010 edition of the McKinsey Quarterly reports that “the way businesses buy from and sell to each other is changing”.

No great surprise there.  The article explores three trends that McKinsey’s analysts heard from senior sales executives.  Now the nature of McKinsey’s sample is such that the results reflect the experience of some of the world’s largest and best established companies – but my own observations suggest that a growing number of successful up-and-coming organisations are already embracing their recommendations.

The “end of the road warrior”?

HelmetOne prediction in particular caught my attention.  Under the heading “the end of the road warrior”, McKinsey pointed out that many sales organisations have built new, lower cost channels to serve smaller customers.  But siloed approaches in which low-value deals are served through a low-touch channel and high-value deals are served through a high-touch direct sales operation are proving - with good reason – to be unnecessarily rigid and increasingly ineffective.

Part of the reason – as McKinsey point out – is that many of the stakeholders and decision makers involved in the buying process have become more relaxed about where and how they get the information they need to support their decision-making.

Time for a blended approach...

For high-value products with complex and lengthy buying cycles, it’s clear that “one-size-fits-all” go-to-market models are hopelessly inadequate to serve today’s buying behaviours.  But it’s equally apparent that rigid demarcation lines that force buyers down specific sales paths according to the value and perceived complexity of their transaction aren’t satisfactory either.

Surely it’s time for a blended approach – one that enables prospects to get the information they need in order to advance their buying process through the medium that they feel most comfortable with.  Rigidly distinctions between inside and outside sales, or direct, indirect and web-based channels aren’t going to help.  Today’s most progressive sales and marketing organisations are thinking “outside in” around how best to facilitate each prospect’s buying decision making process rather than “inside out” around how it might be most internally convenient for them to organise.

Establishing multiple touch points...

We need to establish multiple touch points that can satisfy our prospects and facilitate their buying processes.  Sometimes our prospect’s needs might be best served through face-to-face interaction, at other times through a remote conversation, and at still other times through their ability to “self serve” the information they need.

Our decisions need to be guided by a deep understanding of how – given the dynamics of today’s buying environment – our prospects prefer to receive the information they need during each phase of their buying process in order to facilitate a decision to move forward with us to the next stage.  And, of course, we need to be guided by an appreciation of the costs to us and the value to our prospects of each mode of each interaction.  The goal must be to provide the greatest utility to our prospects in the way that makes the best use of our resources.

Aligning compensation with desired behaviour...

It’s likely that many people could contribute to a successful sale in this new blended model.  And knowing - for sales people in particular – that compensation strongly influences behaviour, it’s important to think through the implications of a fair compensation model that motivates winning behaviour.  

Just as the first past the post voting model seems to have failed the British electorate, simple compensation models that encourage traditional “it’s my deal” behaviours are likely to be counter-productive.  Successful organisations seem to be incorporating incentives that reward collaboration and a shared contribution to sale success.

So – is the era of the road warrior really at an end?

Yes and no.  We are certainly observing a decline in traditional go-it-alone, sales heroics based, road warrior behaviours – but we’re also observing great success in organisations that have successfully created a blended model in which face-to-face interaction is retained where it delivers value to both the prospect and the vendor, and is complemented by alternative methods of interaction where they better support the buying process.

Effective use of technology is clearly a critical factor – to support both remote and self-service interactions.  And there’s no doubt about the attraction of reducing travel costs and avoiding the suffocating and unpredictable grip of Icelandic volcanoes.  Complex, high-value sales will still depend on the power of personal interaction.  But that power will be amplified and focused through the intelligent use of multiple touch points.

Comments

Hello Bob 
 
 
 
(I’ll put this reply on your blog here because it’ll disappear from the LinkedIn news feed after 7 days, and I want to tweet it for open access too). 
 
 
 
I guess since I’ve been selling the mechanisms through which people can execute these sales and marketing plans themselves, and because those “people” are selling products and services which help others to sell and market, and because my main “new” product for the last 5 years has been online (as opposed to an offline version we had 18-25 years ago), I have been more acutely aware of these changes than most. 
 
 
 
I have been obliged to witness the drift from combinations of advertising, direct mail, telemarketing, and then email marketing, into these new hybrids of multimedia and cross-media combinations of integrated sales and marketing, online and offline. That’s been firstly in terms of how it affects us and how we sell and market, and then in turn our clients and how they get on doing the same, primarily to UK sales team leaders. 
 
 
 
It’s interesting, actually, that these rapid changes have actually brought about MORE “in person” meetings of late, for me personally, than would normally be the case, I suspect because the “issues” being discussed are getting more complex and involve than just executing the purchase of another advert, or mailing list, or whatever. But you’re definitely right (or McKinsey and their clients are), in that the silo mentality is dying a death – and with it those demarcation lines and the “command & control” element of corporate thinking which seeks to determine who the next client is going to be, of which size and shape, and based in which geographic location. 
 
 
 
The “change” that has to happen, in switching this thinking from…  
 
 
 
“I’ll decide or determine who we do business with next”  
 
 
 
…into… 
 
 
 
“Are we prepared to respond to whoever might want to buy from us next?”  
 
 
 
…is actually fairly simple to understand. But it’s the ramifications of that, as you rightly point out, that can be more scary than a hung parliament and 5 more years of “no change”.  
 
 
 
Questions do indeed start to pop-up like: - 
 
 
 
What mix of mail, phone, email, physical meetings and online contact would our prospects prefer then? 
 
If you do not have 100 telephone lifts or 6 meetings a day as a KPI, what do you have? 
 
Is “buyer not available” or “no plans for that product/service at present” a rejection, objection, or fact? 
 
Who does get paid, in the sales team, for doing what? 
 
Is “marketing” relevant to my sales team’s activity, and what does that encompass, exactly?  
 
For example does “marketing” still look after “lead generation” or, like Salesforce.com, are we aiming for a 500% global uplift in “Account Exec Generated New Business”? 
 
Are our sales people literate to the point of being able to craft an email reply? 
 
Would we let them blog (like IBM do)? 
 
http://newsaleseconomy.com/should-sales-reps-be-allowed-to-blog-ibm-says-yes 
 
 
 
I also picked up two new buyer surveys over the last week that offer irrefutable proof that there has been a significant shift in buyer behaviours, from board-level C-suite downwards, and dominated by a massive increase in the use of the internet, involving business purchases across the board, and up to tens of millions £/$ value. 
 
 
 
Also, in the last survey, and perhaps most interesting of all, were definite signs that even BANT (Budget Need Authority Timeframe) qualifications, of such buying intent (in order to funnel the relevant people into our qualified marketing-leads-to-selling pipelines) is doomed. Increasing proportions of these purchases are, in fact, no longer budgeted, planned, and put out to tender in the ways of yesteryear, but are increasingly justified after the C-level inspired “opportunity” has been identified, explored (with a savvy multi-media, blogging, IBM-style, road-internet-and-international-telesales-warrior) and then justified on the ROI scale, after the fact. 
 
 
 
Just need to sort out whose running the UK now, and we’ve cracked it I think! 
 
 
 
Thanks, as ever, for your mighty valuable insights. 
 
 
 
Kind regards - Neil 
 
Posted @ Friday, May 07, 2010 4:38 AM by Neil Warren
very interesting and I'm mostly in agreement. Perhaps it's the road warrior metaphor that doesn't completely work for me. Perhaps a more musical metaphor: seems like the value of the soloist is eclipsed by the value of the conductor.
Posted @ Friday, May 07, 2010 5:26 PM by G Demarest
I also got here through linked In. So social media works! 
 
Having been a road-warrior, marketeer and a channel guy, I think the article makes a lot of sense. To the other challenges raised, however, I would add channel conflict. If anyone can speak to anyone in any way then you will get conflict between direct (Company rep/On-line/Phone etc) and the channel and just end up under-cutting yourself. 
 
In B2B IT, where I live, there is a need for people to 'talk to someone' ie to see a Road Warrior before deciding on anything but the most commoditised products.  
 
However, in all the research we do, the decision-makers from the smallest SME to the largest Telco do their research on-line first. So the Road-Warrior needs to add a different value. They need to do their on-line research as well (customer's industry, contacts in the company on their social network etc etc).  
 
If this means more time thinking and less time driving, then so much better for the environment.
Posted @ Monday, May 10, 2010 10:08 AM by Chris Marshall
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics