Quick links ...

Sales and Marketing Alignment Orange

 

Latest White Paper Orange

Subscribe to this blog ...

Your email:

Follow ...

Favourite bloggers ...


On Reflexion - what we've been thinking...

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

What if product marketing saw itself as "problem solving marketing"?

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | 

I was reflecting on a thought-provoking blog by Dave Brock, who asked "what would happen if we saw things the way our customers saw them?".

As Dave points out, your capabilities as a vendor are irrelevant unless and until they can be connected to your prospect’s challenges in a language they can relate to. Your value propositions can’t be generic – they have to relate to what really matters to the prospect.

Problem SolverThe really smart sales people have already figured this out.  That’s why they so often tailor the “corporate” presentations churned out by marketing to reflect what they have learned their prospects are really interested in... which is almost never the "feeds and speeds" or technobabble so beloved of the average product pitch.

Marketers, this is no time to get upset with them or curse them as rebels.   They are only responding to what they sense their prospects are looking for - and remember they are probably having many more prospect conversations than anyone else in the organisation.  Let's celebrate their adaptability!

Imagine what could happen if product marketing listened to and learned from their wisdom?  Imagine what they could produce if they saw their primary role as "problem solving marketing" instead?

Of course, the best product marketers do this already - to the great benefit of the organisations they work for.  But from my observations, many others - and it's a significant proportion - are still far too fixated about what their product does, rather than what problem it solves.

The resulting sales tools often end up wandering around like the Marie Celeste, with no clear sense of their destination or what role they play in facilitating the prospect's buying process.  As a result, as many as nine out of ten corporate sales tools end up being little used by sales people.   It's a huge sales enablement challenge for many organisations.

I'd like to suggest a checklist that could help to ensure that sales materials are focused on the problem, not the product:

  • What problem are we trying to solve?
  • Who are we trying to solve it for? 
  • How will they recognise they have a problem?
  • How do our capabilities help them solve the problem?
  • What phase in the buying process is the sales tool intended to support?
  • What do we want the prospect to do as a result of the tool?

I think it's a fair bet that if your organisation's sales tools were designed with these questions in mind that your sales people would be more inclined to use them and less inclined to develop their own.  Even more so if they contributed to the design and development of the tools in the first place.

Am I on the right track?  I'd love to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Are you ready for a fresh perspective?

Would you like to learn more?  Then please continue to browse the site and when you are ready, contact me here or call me on +44 7802 313300.

I look forward to hearing from you!

Comments

I am not convinced you should blame it all on the product marketers. It always comes back to that same problem: communication. 
 
Customers communicate in a one way to sales, sales communicate in another way to marketing. We all assume marketing knows the problems and pains of the customers. I can tell you marketing does not! Unless sales is willing to talk (translate) these customer demands to the marketing department, before they start to prepare presentations and other marketing material for sales and customers.
Posted @ Monday, November 09, 2009 10:15 AM by Piet
Piet 
 
Your absolutely right in thinking of this as a communication problem. Sales and marketing need to develop a common language and a common understanding. Both parties need to contribute to this.
Posted @ Monday, November 09, 2009 10:35 AM by Bob Apollo
May I take a slightly different view? 
 
 
 
If you are a product based company then the customer pain should be identified by the product guys (development, R&D, etc) and marketing should be their voice, mapping the business value across the pain. I think of it as translating. 
 
 
 
If all you did was listen to the sales guy you'd end up with a bigger version of your competitors products, 12 months after they have been in the market, using the same messages and not able to differentiate yourselves. 
 
 
 
However the value of using good sales people as a sounding board when you are putting messages/material together cannot be overestimated. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:52 AM by Ed Jones
Ed, clearly your approach can work - IF the product and marketing people are in as frequent touch with potential prospects as the sales people are. But in my experience this rarely happens. 
 
Equally, just listening to the sales guy can have as unreliable an effect as having them own win-loss reports (see my earlier blog on that subject. 
 
The real learning comes from asking them what their prospects are saying and asking. But maybe what I'm really saying is that positioning any offering has to be a collaborative exercise between all customer-facing departments.
Posted @ Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:14 AM by Bob Apollo
I definitely agree on this collaborative exercise idea. I work for a Japanese company, all the product guys are in Japan, and whenever I ask for a change to an existing or future product I have to support my demand with sales numbers. 
 
Why isn't it the standard procedure that Japanese product guys come over to Europe and America to try to understand our markets? Changes and improvements to products would be cheaper if they are recognized as needed from the beginning of the R&D process.
Posted @ Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:55 AM by Piet
Piet 
 
The challenge with international operations was explained to me when I was at HP as "selling globally by working locally". There's no way that someone responsible for specifying a product can do a great job unless they are familiar with the market it is aimed at. I once came across someone with the title "global product manager" who didn't even have a passport!  
 
Not a good start. Do all that you can to encourage your product people to come over. Tell them they will learn something. They'll actually learn a lot - and see their product line revenues soar.
Posted @ Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:14 AM by Bob Apollo
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics